Review

Frostpunk 2 review: building a city during the apocalypse

17/9/2024

Translation: Patrik Stainbrook

In the strategy city builder Frostpunk 2, it’s inevitable you’ll become a cold-weather despot. That’s not a cakewalk, partly because the game also mirrors current world events. The whole thing’s wrapped up in steampunk aesthetics and beautiful art.

The world has been frozen over for half a century. It’s 1916 in this parallel timeline. Humanity is eternally battling the constant cold, but has largely come to terms with it. In the first Frostpunk, I was still building a city with a handful of people. By now, I’m a step further. As the newly elected mayor of New London, it’s up to me to make the right decisions and lead the city into the future so that humanity survives and, in the luckiest case, even flourishes. Tough snowstorms, epidemics, air pollution and other disasters demand everything from me and my people.

More macro, less micro

Compared to its predecessor, Frostpunk 2 has zoomed out a bit. Both literally and figuratively. The camera’s no longer as close to the action. I can’t see individual citizens scurrying around between houses, but entire neighbourhoods. Instead of drawing individual paths, I plan entire blocks on hexagonal fields, clearing them of ice and snow beforehand. Micromanagement has given way to grander plans, which I appreciate. Different quarters serve different purposes. Citizens live in the Housing District, but work in the Industrial or Food District. Small map icons show me where I should build what. Various upgrades allow me to pimp my buildings and extract raw materials such as coal, oil, wood or food quicker, explore my surroundings more efficiently or lighten the mood in the city.

A Housing District under development.
Source: Simon Balissat

I have to keep the people happy, otherwise I’ll be voted out of office quicker than Rishi Sunak. Still, the most important thing is the generator in the centre of the city, which provides heat. Initially, it burns fossil fuels such as coal, polluting the air. Later on, other options come along. If the generator isn’t running, the mood immediately sinks and my grip on power begins to loosen. In a new addition, a parliament now decides on the laws that are passed and therefore the direction that I take. Several factions and communities can still rebel and oppose me. While the Stalwarts are fully committed to law and order, the Pilgrims are religious anarcho-traditionalists who see human equality as the highest good. I can’t satisfy each group, some of them always hold opposing views. At least I can see how the groups will react to new laws or technologies that have been passed and react accordingly.

I’m offering the New Londoners a deal to support my cause.
Source: Simon Balissat

Before the Council passes a law, I can influence it with promises. As an example, I persuade the New Londoners to approve the admission of foreigners by promising to build a recycling plant. If I build the factory, the faction is happy. If I don’t keep my promise, the faction increasingly turns against me, which can lead to riots across neighbourhoods. It’s a balancing act – one that often leads to laws being passed or technologies being researched that I don’t really want. It takes me out of my comfort zone, in a good way. I have to be creative in finding solutions since things often turn out differently than expected.

Death in the eternal ice

Story mode first introduces me to the mechanics across several acts, then lets me fight for survival. No spoilers, but New London will soon be too small, and the resources are running out. It’s why I keep sending out scouting parties. Outposts provide urgently needed raw materials and tell the sometimes very dark story. Survivors are rare in the icy desert, often there’s just abandoned ruins lined with corpses. Death and illness are omnipresent in Frostpunk 2.

A concerned citizen fears the next ice storm.
Source: Simon Balissat

The question’s not whether, but how many people will die. On expeditions, when mining raw materials, from disease. A short pop-up window at the bottom right informs you how many people have just died at regular intervals. This isn’t easy to digest at first. At some point, though, I become indifferent and see people as just another resource. Whether I find a camp with 3,000 units of food or a camp with 3,000 survivors – I don’t care, they’re all consumables.

In this respect, Frostpunk 2 requires the appropriate constitution. The world is cold and merciless, death and misery are a fact of life. Even if I do everything right, I’m always lagging behind somewhere. Sometimes there’s not enough wood to maintain my buildings, then I don’t have any beds or coal for the generator runs out. This is typical of strategy building games, but it bothers me less in Anno or Tropico. In the dystopia of Frostpunk 2, the constant lack of food makes me feel particularly miserable. Little stories in the margins, illustrated with dark artwork recounting ruin, but also small joys among my populace, contribute to this.

The Pilgrims have their demands, but they’ll help me explore if they trust me.
Source: Simon Balissat

Action, reaction

What I particularly like is that I can make various decisions during the campaign which have a noticeable influence on the further course of my game. I can’t decide what’s right or wrong, and it’s often a choice between plague and cholera. Should I leave a mass grave alone, but risk the death of dozens of researchers since I can’t get to the resources underneath it? My decision to clear the mass grave would come back to haunt me later in the game.

Small decisions often have a big impact. Whenever I think I’ve slowly got everything under control, everything collapses like a house of cards. This can detract from the fun of the game. I had to pull myself together several times to manoeuvre my population out of a seemingly hopeless situation. Speaking of getting yourself together: in addition to the campaign, which takes around 15 hours to complete, there’s only a sandbox mode called Utopia with seven possible maps. It’s rather meagre in terms of content. The developers are also adding mod support with the release. Community content shouldn’t be too far away.

Resources initially seem abundant until they’re suddenly all used up.
Source: Simon Balissat

Whiteout instead of dark mode

Technically, the game’s stylised and calm. White dominates, naturally, so the game isn’t for fans of dark mode. The surroundings and buildings stand out from the white soup and are designed in detail. But I don’t have time to study them anyway. The interface looks tidy and is mostly self-explanatory. Only selecting individual buildings is sometimes confusing, since possible building types always appear in a different order in a bar at the bottom of the screen. There are also bugs that may still be ironed out. Sometimes I had a few frame drops, which shouldn’t happen in a building strategy game. The German translation wasn’t quite perfect in the review version, but developer 11-Bit has assured us this’ll improve at launch.

Frostpunk 2 will be released on 20 September on PC, Mac, PS5 and X Box. The test version was provided to us by the developer.

In a nutshell

Gloomy strategy building game with a political undercurrent

Like its predecessor, Frostpunk 2 is extremely dark and dystopian. If you’re looking for a laid-back city builder to relax, this isn’t the game for you. Rays of hope are few and far between, death and despair are omnipresent. Not everyone’s cup of tea. The political element, the exciting story and the decisions and consequences you have to live with are fascinating though. Sure, it lacks the complexity of other similar games. If you’re looking for the great depth and dependencies of Anno, you won’t find them here. Nevertheless, Frostpunk 2 is a worthy successor. No more annoying micromanaging. Exploration and politics take up more time, which I appreciate. If you can cope with the gloomy setting, definitely pick it up. Frostpunk 2 only just misses out on four stars.

Pro

Decisions that have a real impact on the game
Less micromanaging than in the first part
Great story
Simple policy system that’s nevertheless demanding
Great design and loving storytelling

Contra

Relatively short campaign at 10 to 15 hours
Some technical flaws involving frame drops
In addition to the campaign, there’s «only» a sandbox mode
When things are going well, external influences destroy your progress and set you back a bit

Header image: 11 bit Studios

16 people like this article

Simon Balissat

Teamleader Editorial

Simon.Balissat@digitecgalaxus.ch

When I flew the family nest over 15 years ago, I suddenly had to cook for myself. But it wasn’t long until this necessity became a virtue. Today, rattling those pots and pans is a fundamental part of my life. I’m a true foodie and devour everything from junk food to star-awarded cuisine. Literally. I eat way too fast.

Review

Which films, shows, books, games or board games are genuinely great? Recommendations from our personal experience.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

Review
Herdling review: a magical journey that lacks highlights
by Philipp Rüegg
Review
Pleasure and frustration go hand in hand in origami platformer Hirogami
by Kevin Hofer
Review
"Digimon Story Time Stranger" tested: A JRPG that is addictive
by Kevin Hofer