Seagate FireCuda 520

1000 GB, M.2 2280

Product details

The Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD with 4x PCIe interface (4th generation) offers nearly 45% faster sequential read and write speeds compared to the previous generation. It is plug-and-play compatible with all PCIe 4.0 motherboards and provides an extreme performance boost thanks to the latest 3D TLC NAND technology. Upgrading to the FireCuda 520 unleashes the full speed of the 4th generation, allowing for sequential read speeds up to nine times faster than SATA SSDs.

Key specifications

SSD type
M.2 SSD
Interface
PCIe 4.0
Protocol
NVMe
Write transfer speed
4400 MB/s
Read transfer speed
5000 MB/s
Max. random 4K read
760000 IOPS
Max. random 4K write
700000 IOPS
Item number
12307106

General information

Manufacturer
Category
Manufacturer no.
ZP1000GM3A002
Release date
29.10.2019
External links

Data storage properties

SSD type
M.2 SSD
Form factor
M.2 2280
Storage capacity
1000 GB
Data storage interface
PCIe 4.0
SSD protocol
NVMe
Read transfer speed
5000 MB/s
Write transfer speed
4400 MB/s
Memory type (NAND)
TLC
Max. random 4K read
760000 IOPS
Max. random 4K write
700000 IOPS
Max. TBW (Total Bytes Written)
1800 TB
SSD Features
SMART Support

Power supply

Power consumption (standby)
0.02 W
Power consumption
5.60 W

Origin

Country of origin
Singapore

Sustainability

Manufacturer commitment
SBTi

Scope of delivery

Scope of delivery
1 x Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD 1 TB PCIe Gen4 x4 NVMe

Product dimensions

Length
8 cm
Width
2.20 cm
Height
0.36 cm
Weight
8.50 g

Package dimensions

Length
15.50 cm
Width
11 cm
Height
2.50 cm
Weight
56 g

Legal Notice

Product Safety

Here you can see the lowest price of the day over time. Learn more













Reviews & Ratings

Statutory warranty score

How often does a product of this brand in the «SSD» category have a defect within the first 24 months?

Source: Galaxus
  • 6.SanDisk
    0,6 %
  • 8.Kingston
    0,7 %
  • 9.Seagate
    0,8 %
  • 9.WD
    0,8 %
  • 11.Corsair
    0,9 %

Statutory warranty case duration

How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?

Source: Galaxus
  • 1.Verbatim
    0 days
  • 11.Crucial
    1 day
  • 11.Seagate
    1 day
  • 13.Corsair
    2 days
  • 13.HPE
    2 days

Return rate

How often is a product of this brand in the «SSD» category returned?

Source: Galaxus
  • 20.Emtec
    3,5 %
  • 21.Transcend
    3,8 %
  • 22.Seagate
    3,9 %
  • 23.Dell
    4,6 %
  • 24.HPE
    5 %

Translation: machine translated
Overall ratingVery good86/100
Very good88/100
Computer Bild Logo
Rank 7 out of 8Computer BildTest SSDs - M.2-SSDs PCI-Express 4.0ReleaseMarch 2021

Curious: among the fast PCI Express 4.0 SSDs, two models achieved both test and price-performance victory thanks to identical test scores and the same sales price - the Western Digital Black SN850 and the Samsung 980 Pro. This is rare for Computer Bild.

Very good82/100
PCgo Logo
Rank 6 out of 6PCgoVergleichstest M.2-Solid-State-ModuleReleaseFebruary 2021

It's fascinating how fast SSDs have become - even faster with PCIe 4.0. However, this comparative test also seems to reveal an unattractive tendency: The faster the SSDs become, the less durable they are likely to be. At least that is what the TBW suggests. However, we did not measure this.

Very good82/100
PC Magazin Logo
Rank 6 out of 6PC MagazinVergleichstest M.2-Solid-State-ModuleReleaseJanuary 2021

The FireCuda 520 is solid and promises a long service life according to the manufacturer. Cooling fins are not available free of charge.

Very good90/100
PC Magazin Logo
Rank 3 out of 6PC MagazinSSDs mit Super-TurboReleaseAugust 2020

The FireCuda 520 from Seagate is a very good SSM with excellent performance. However, it lacks a heat sink and there are significantly cheaper SSMs that deliver similar performance.

Very good90/100
PCgo Logo
Rank 3 out of 6PCgoSSDs mit Super-Turbo unter der HaubeReleaseMay 2020

The Firecuda 520 from Seagate is a very good SSM with excellent performance. However, it lacks a heat sink and there are significantly cheaper SSMs that deliver similar performance.